Introduction of AI in companies: Why people are more important than technology

The introduction of AI rarely fails because of technology — but almost always because of people, processes and expectations. Many companies invest in powerful AI tools, but still see no sustainable benefits in everyday life. The reason: AI is thought of as an IT project, not as a change in the way we work.

This article shows how AI implementation realistically works — beyond tool hype and buzzwords.

‍

Understanding AI implementation correctly: Not a tool project, but change

Many organizations start their introduction of AI with a seemingly logical question: Which AI tool should we use?
This is often where the problem starts.

AI is not only changing what We do, but like We work:

• How decisions are prepared
• How knowledge is created
• How tasks are distributed and evaluated

Anyone who introduces AI like classic software overlooks this effect. AI intervenes directly in thinking, writing and decision-making processes. That makes them powerful — but also sensitive.

A successful introduction of AI therefore requires more than technology: It needs orientation, trust and new routines.

‍

‍

Introduction of AI and the 80/20 principle: Where the lever really lies

In practice, there is always a clear pattern:
About 20% of work The introduction of AI involves technology (tools, models, interfaces).
The remaining 80% affect people and organizations.

This 80% includes:

• Acceptance within the team
• Competence in working with AI
• clear rules and guidelines
• suitable use cases in everyday work
• Leadership and role model

Companies that underestimate this share invest in tools — but create frustration, uncertainty, or even shadow AI.

‍

Adoption of AI often fails due to acceptance, not performance

A common misconception: If the AI is good enough, it will prevail.
The reality is different.

When introducing AI, employees often ask themselves unsaid:

• Am I even allowed to use it?
• Am I making myself replaceable?
• Am I allowed to make mistakes?
• Who does the result belong to?
• Am I responsible for incorrect answers from the AI?

If these questions remain unanswered, there is reluctance — even if the tool would be objectively helpful.

Acceptance does not come from technology, but from Safety and clarity.

‍

‍

Psychological safety as a key

Psychological safety is a key success factor in the introduction of AI.
Employees must experience:

• AI usage is welcome, not suspicious
• Questions are allowed
• Learning is more important than perfection
• AI is support, not a control tool

When teams are afraid of doing something “wrong,” they either don't use AI at all — or secretly. Both are problematic.

A good introduction of AI therefore explicitly creates space for experimentation within clear guidelines.

‍

‍

Introduction of AI requires clear rules — but simple ones

Many companies are responding to uncertainty with lengthy guidelines. The opposite makes more sense.

For the introduction of AI, clear, simple rules proven, for example in the form of an AI traffic light:

• green: What is allowed? (e.g. texts without sensitive data)
• yellow: What only to a limited extent? (e.g. anonymized content)
• red: What is taboo? (e.g. personal or confidential information)

This clarity lowers barriers and prevents shadow AI without stifling innovation.

‍

‍

AI introduction starts with the right use cases

Another common mistake: Companies start with AI projects that are too large, too complex.

Successful AI implementation almost always starts with simple, everyday use cases, for example:

• Email and text drafts
• Meeting summaries
• Structuring offers or presentations
• Searching for knowledge in internal documents
• Research and preparation support

These use cases have three advantages:
They are easy to learn, low in risk and provide immediate tangible benefits.

Only when these basics are in place is the next step towards automation and integration worthwhile.

‍

‍

Why training alone is not enough

A one-time AI training session is not enough. Introduction of AI is not knowledge, but a Routine topic.

What really works:

• short, practical training
• Work on real tasks instead of demo examples
• Prompt templates and best practices
• Exchange between teams
• regular refreshment instead of a one-time event

The aim is not to turn everyone into AI experts — but safe, sovereign users.

‍

‍

AI introduction and leadership: Exemplaining beats explaining

Managers have a key role to play in the introduction of AI.
Not as technology experts — but as cultural role models.

When managers:

• Visibly use AI yourself
• Talk openly about opportunities and limits
• Questioning results instead of blindly accepting
• Allow learning

... that's when AI becomes normal in the team.

On the other hand, if leadership remains distant or simply delegates AI, it remains a “tool for others.”

‍

‍

Where success is really visible

Many companies miscalculate the introduction of AI — based on the number of licenses, for example.

More useful questions include:

• Is AI being used regularly?
• Does it save measurably time?
• Does it improve quality or consistency?
• Do employees feel safe working with them?
• Is the need for shadow AI falling?

AI implementation is successful when it commonplace will — not spectacular.

‍

AI introduction as a continuous process

AI is developing rapidly. Therefore, the introduction of AI is not a project with an end date, but a learning process.

That means:

• Review rules regularly
• Include new use cases
• Develop or change tools
• Take feedback seriously
• Continuously expand competencies

Companies that understand AI in this way remain able to act — even if models, providers, or regulatory requirements change.

‍

‍

AI introduction FAQ

‍

What is the most common mistake when introducing AI?

Treating AI as a pure IT or tool project and underestimating the human factor.

‍

How long does a successful introduction of AI take?

First results are often possible within a few weeks. Sustainable integration takes months — depending on culture, leadership and willingness to learn.

‍

Do we need complex AI automation right away?

No For most companies, the biggest lever initially lies in assistance use cases for knowledge work.

‍

How do I prevent team resistance?

Through clear rules, practical training, visible benefits and an open learning culture.

‍

‍

Conclusion: AI introduction is a cultural project

The introduction of AI does not succeed with the best technology, but with the right attitude. Anyone who takes people along, provides orientation and enables learning creates the basis for sustainable use of AI.

Technology is important — but it's interchangeable.
It is not competence, trust and culture.

The KI Company supports companies in exactly this type of AI implementation: pragmatic, people-centered and with a focus on real added value in everyday life. From initial assessment to use case workshops to governance, training and rollout. You can always contact us without obligation.