Thinking models: What makes them special

Thinking models are considered the next stage in the development of modern AI. They not only provide quick answers, but are also designed to to think through complex problems in a structured wayto consider intermediate steps and deliver more consistent results. Especially in a corporate context, they are changing like AI can be used - and like We need to talk to her.

‍

‍

What is behind the term?

Thinking models are AI models that are explicitly designed to To think in multiple stepsbefore they provide an answer. Instead of generating a result immediately, they analyze the task, break it down internally into sub-problems and carry out a kind of “mental approach.”

In contrast to classical language models, the focus is not only on linguistic probability (“What sounds right? “), but on logical coherence, planning, and consistency across multiple steps.

This makes thinking models particularly suitable for tasks that involve not only formulations, but decisions, considerations and structured analysis.

‍

‍

Thinking models vs. classic AI models

The difference is particularly evident in the working style of AI.

Classic models are very strong at this

• to formulate texts
• Summarize content
• to deliver creative options
• to generate plausible answers quickly

Thinking models, on the other hand, are optimized for:

• complex issues with multiple dependencies
• strategic considerations
• logical conclusions
• structured problem solving

While classic models often answer “intuitively,” thinking models work methodical. They are less susceptible to superficial short circuits, but they also require clearer tasks.

‍

Why thinking models are particularly relevant in companies

In everyday business life, the requirements for AI results are increasing. It is no longer enough that something “sounds good.” Must answer:

• Be comprehensible
• remain consistent with objectives and goals
• consider multiple perspectives
• Identify risks and dependencies

This is exactly where thinking models show their strength.

Typical fields of application are:

• strategic analyses
• Decision support
• Process and scenario evaluation
• complex offer or project logics
• Business cases and prioritization

Instead of just delivering content, thinking models help to structure thinking.

A common mistake is to treat thinking models like classic chatbots: short prompts, little context, expect quick results.

In practice, this often leads to disappointing results — not because the model is bad, but because it Wrongly addressed will.

Thinking models only develop their added value when you allow (and pretend) them to work systematically. They are intended less for spontaneous one-liners and more for consciously formulated tasks.

‍

‍

Prompting in thinking models: The most important difference

The biggest difference in prompting is:
👉 Thinking models need clarity about the reasoning, not just about the goal.

For classic models, it is often enough:
“Write me a summary...”

With thinking models, it is more effective:
“Analyze the topic in a structured way, identify key factors, evaluate them and make a recommendation. ”

So you're not just giving that upshot, but also the type of thinking before.

‍

‍

Good prompts for thinking models are more structured

A clear structure in the prompt has proven effective, for example:

1. context
   What is it about? In which environment? With which framework conditions?
2. target
   What should be available at the end? Decision, recommendation, analysis, comparison?
3. Proceed
   How should the model think? Step-by-step, comparative, critical, prioritizing?
4. criteria
   What standards should be used for evaluation?
5. format
   How should the result be structured?

Thinking models respond very well to such explicit ideas.

‍

‍

Example: Classic vs. thinking prompt

Classic:
“Which AI use cases make sense for our company? ”

Suitable for thinking models:
“Analyze possible AI use cases for a medium-sized B2B company.
Proceed in the following steps:

1. Identify typical core processes
2. Evaluate the automation and assistance potential for each process
3. Consider effort, risk, and benefit
4. Prioritize the top 5 use cases and justify the selection. ”

The second prompt forces the model to proceed methodically — That is exactly what thinking models are made for.

‍

‍

What you should consciously avoid when prompting

Thinking models are more sensitive to unclear or contradictory instructions.

Typical mistakes include:

• too vague goals (“Do an analysis”)
• several conflicting requirements in one sentence
• lack of context (“for whom? “, “within which framework? “)
• Expect immediate, short answers

Also important: Thinking models are not there to output every intermediate step unfiltered. What is decisive is that Better quality end result, not the visible thought process.

‍

‍

Added value is created through dialogue

Another difference: Thinking models benefit greatly from iteration.

Instead of saying everything “perfectly” in one prompt, it often makes more sense:

• create the first analysis
• targeted resharpening
• Questioning assumptions
• Play through alternatives

Especially when it comes to strategic or sensitive topics, this creates a real think-partner effect — much closer to human collaboration than with classic AI answers.

‍

‍

When thinking models are the wrong choice

Despite all their strengths, thinking models are not always the best option.

They are less suitable for:

• pure text production without depth of content
• fast, creative variants without the need for analysis
• simple translations or rewording
• very short, spontaneous questions

In these cases, classic, faster models are often more efficient. The key is The right model for the right task to choose.

Using thinking models correctly in a corporate context

For companies, this means that thinking models should be used specifically where thinking power is in demand — not everywhere.

It makes sense to have a clear separation:

• Standard AI for operational tasks
• Thinking models for analysis, strategy, decision preparation

This requires:

• clear use case definitions
• suitable prompt templates
• Training employees to “ask the right questions”

Without these guidelines, thinking models often fall short of their capabilities.

‍

‍

FAQ about thinking models

‍

Are thinking models always better than other AI models?

No They're better for complex, multi-step tasks — but often slower and oversized for simple tasks.

‍

Do I have to adjust anything technically to use thinking models?

Not usually. It is not so much the technology that is decisive than the type of prompting and the task.

‍

Do employees need special training for this?

Yes, short enablement formats at least. Dealing with thinking models requires a different mindset than classic “chat prompting.”

‍

Do thinking models replace human decisions?

No They support thinking and structuring — responsibility and final decisions remain with people.

‍

‍

Conclusion: Thinking models are thinking enhancers, not answer machines

Thinking models mark an important step in the development of AI: away from a pure text generator, towards structured thought partners.

Your added value is not created automatically, but by:

• clear tasks
• good prompting
• conscious selection of fields of application

Companies that use thinking models correctly not only gain speed, but above all better decisions.

The KI Company helps companies to meaningfully integrate thinking models into everyday working life: from use case definition to prompt playbooks to training for teams and managers. If you want to know where thinking models provide you with real added value, we would be happy to advise you without obligation.